Kaban ni D_BystandeR: MGA PANAN-AW
indiosbravos2002 wrote, in response to D_BystandeR:
Agree. Not to mention SC's speedy TRO decision on Corona's case while the impeqchment case was ongoing. I am actually in favor of De Lima getting the post, only just because I wanted someone to PURGE the corrupt SC of Corona/GMA's spirit. There are still 8 or so Justices and 1 gay court administrator who do not belong at the SC.
D_BystandeR wrote:
It will be greatly unfair if De Lima is disqualified because of "foot-dragging" by SC to resolve her disbarment question. Time and again, we witness the SC's "lightning" response to concern relating to question regarding GMA's freedom to travel abroad to seek medical treatment for her "bloated" physical deficiencies. If De Lima is disqualified due to SC's inaction to act on her impending case with dispatch, it will be construed to be due to SC's interest to bag the most coveted title of CJ of which a number of them are already salivating the position.
Options: Reply with "Like" to like this comment, or respond in the body to post a reply comment. |
Comments