Kaban ni D_BystandeR: NAUSAB NGA PANAHOM

To abruptly change the tenor of the author's (Atty. JBJ) argument that while he previously espoused and vouched for the preference of VP Binay to lead the country after P-Noy's term ends, it will certainly provide the readers with some "loose talks" that somehow, somewhere, something snaps on account of some "pressure" applied to the author's pen. For how can you validly support a change in your previous line of argument and still convince your column's followers with the same resoluteness but this time, as if trying to condone the unpardonable  blunder of P-Noy that resulted to the deaths of 44 SAFs. And now you want to  change your argument in midstream because of the simple reason that "you  don't want to rock the boat in the middle of a raging storm? If it was possible to happen to other countries, like Japan, that the head of state has tendered  his resignation because of a big blunder, why make the case happening to P-Noy an exception? I don't think P-Noy has the monopoly of his "intelligence" if we equate the several blunders committed in his administration as such. The loss of the lives of 44 SAFs is too much and yet to think that the President in his succeeding pronouncements did not even offer his apology and instead contented himself by blaming Napenas for the Mamasaspano fiasco is a scary sign that this man will still commit the same or more serious blunder in the future before his term ends.

Footnote: This comment came out in connection with an article written by Atty. JBJ in The FREEMAN, entitled, "Rocking the boat while a storm is raging." It came out on March 16, 2015.