Kaban ni D_BystandeR: NAHISALAAG ANG AMLC???

And they are doing that because if they apply equality and fairness they will all look like a laughing stock! Nobody will believe them. And the AMLC, where originally it was intended by law to conduct surveillance only to terrorists, drug syndicates, smugglers, etc., now they change the function of AMLC because its principal function now is to unfairly assist  the P-Noy administration to unjustly dig into the financial accounts of the opposition in order to make clandestine operation to get all information in the opposition's bank accounts even if the accounts are already closed and they will make their own personal and bias assumption that the accounts are fraudulent. Instead of asking the account holder to explain the transactions because he is the one more knowledgeable about it, AMLC will directly expose it to the media without first notifying the owner of the account in utter violation of the banking laws where nobody can touch your account and expose it. But only AMLC is allowed to do it to prevent money laundering by syndicates but now it is the opposition being targeted under the P-Noy administration. It's degrading!

It's clearly a lame excuse of P-Noy to disclaim any knowledge about the  insidious operation of AMLC to unjustly dig into the financial bank accounts of Binay and associates for the purpose of persecuting the opposition. The political allies of P-Noy who are suspected by the people of having accumulated questionable and huge financial bank accounts like Sen. Franklin Drilon and Budget Secretary Butch Abad were recommended by the opposition to be subjected to the same surveillance by AMLC and to make their findings in public to make the playing field fair and square. It is a fact, as stated by VP Binay, that SBRC operators are treating their resource persons like criminals and subject them to insults, ridicule and harassment if they come to testify in that inquiry in behalf of Binay while, on the other hand, the attack dogs of SBRC operators who are enjoying wide latitude of freedom in that inquiry like Ernesto Mercado, Atty. Bondal, etc., they are all allowed to say anything they want even without any supporting evidence as all their charges are  baseless and unfounded and purely guesswork. And they are encouraged to  say anything more hurting and derogatory to Binay because that is what their  motive is all about, to see to it that Binay's image and reputation is totally demolished, maligned, and maliciously castigated! That is totally unfair!

Footnote: This comment came out in reply to a comment by someone who calls himself "isalexus," in connection with a news item in Philstar, entitled, "Binay needs to answer allegations of corruption." It came out on May 25, 2015.